Key Findings
- We need to do better for low-income households. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia do not require that the interests of low-income customers be considered when power rates are being set or approved.
- Vermont empowers the electricity regulator to approve rate schedules, tariffs, agreements, contracts, or settlements that provide reduced rates for low-income customers. Massachusetts is even stronger as it actually requires the regulator to ensure that electric distribution companies provide discounted rates for eligible low-income customers.
- Prioritizing non-polluting sources of electricity also benefits affordability through avoiding pollution charges like carbon taxes.
- Extreme weather events are becoming more common as climate change worsens. We need to keep our households and businesses safer in extreme events by making electricity systems more resilient and reliable. New Brunswick and Nova Scotia are comparable to those in Québec, Massachusetts, and Vermont as all five jurisdictions employ enforceable reliability standards developed by the North American Reliability Electric Corporation (the “NERC”).
- With respect to additional performance, service, or reliability standards, Nova Scotia and Massachusetts alone have established laws that require such additional standards. Nova Scotia requires service and performance standards addressing reliability, adverse weather response, and customer service; Massachusetts requires performance standards for emergency preparation and service restoration. Of the two, Nova Scotia appears to offer the most robust standard-setting regime.
- both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia could look to Massachusetts as a model for rate accommodations for low-income ratepayers;
- New Brunswick could look to Nova Scotia as a model for using ratepayer funds to pay for cost-effective energy efficiency and conservation programs and initiatives designed to benefit low-income ratepayers;
- New Brunswick could look to Nova Scotia and Massachusetts as models for improved standards regimes;
- both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia could look to Québec for an example of a regulator mandate that expressly includes sustainability and equity concerns;
- both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia could look to Vermont for a model of more progressively empowered public-interest advocacy in regulatory proceedings; and,
- both New Brunswick and Nova Scotia could look to Massachusetts and Vermont for models of regimes that require increasingly ambitious renewable electricity requirements beyond 2020.